Partial Birth Abortion Ban Challenged
March 29, 2004
A federal ban on partial birth abortions was challenged in three courtrooms
around the US Monday. Abortion rights activists say that it infringes
on women’s right to choose. The law is called the Partial-Birth
Abortion Ban Act. The law was the first real limitation on abortion since
the infamous Roe v. Wade decision.
Attorney A. Stephen Hut Jr. representing the plaintiffs, says that the
law “in its stunning breadth woulr … remove the range of abortion
alternatives available to women in the second trimester.” He cautioned
that the evidence will include “very raw stuff” and that descriptions
of the surgery were “not for the faint of heart.” (ok, so
he says that the people don’t need a description of the surgery…wow…he
sounds about as smart as a pickled beet)
Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean H. Lane described the law as an attempt to
ban an “inhumane and gruesome procedure that causes pain to the
fetus.” He also said that, “Evidence at trial will illuminate
that partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary and is an inhumane
procedure that should be banned.”
Pro Life groups call the procedure “partial birth abortion”
and doctors who perform it call it “intact dilation and extraction”
(basically a nice way of saying “sucking the brains out of the partially
born child”)
There are an estimated 2,200 to 5,000 such abortions committed annually
in the United States, out of 1.3 Million total. Pro Choice groups claim
that the law was written too broadly and vaguely, it threatens to adversely
affect the health of some mothers. They say that the language used in
the law could criminalize more abortion types and could be a step toward
abolishing abortion. (sarcasm begin: oh we cant let that happen :end sarcasm)
When asked by a government lawyer if the fetus experiences pain during
partial birth abortions, Maureen Paul, chief medical office for Planned
Parenthood in San Francisco, replied, “I have no idea what you mean.”
(Can you say IGNORANT?)
The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act carries a maximum two year prison term
for doctors that perform this procedure. (which should be more, maybe,
say…life…or death)